According to the source, a claim circulated that BitMine purchased 63,539 ETH (~$251M) and now holds ~$13.07B in ETH; however, this cannot be verified via primary disclosures or on-chain evidence at the time of writing, and we do not cite competing crypto media as sources. Traders should await a verifiable primary source such as an official company statement, regulatory filing, or identifiable wallet activity before acting on this headline. Source: an X/Twitter post; verification should rely on official company communications, SEC/EDGAR or equivalent regulator databases, and on-chain explorers like Etherscan for transaction hashes and wallet attribution.

According to @EmberCN, an unidentified whale or institution withdrew 700 million USDC from Binance into four on-chain wallets about a week ago. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1980282037216133453 According to @EmberCN, three of these wallets later supplied a combined 610 million USDC as collateral on Aave and borrowed a total of 66,000 ETH (about $262 million), then transferred the ETH to Binance. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1980282037216133453; Debank: debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8 According to @EmberCN, the fourth wallet still holds 91.2 million USDC unutilized for collateral as of the post. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1980282037216133453; Debank: debank.com/profile/0xfaf1358fe6a9fa29a169dfc272b14e709f54840f According to @EmberCN, address-level breakdown shows 190M USDC collateral borrowing 20,000 ETH at 0x6e9e..., 200M USDC borrowing 22,000 ETH at 0xe5c2..., and 220M USDC borrowing 24,000 ETH at 0x85e0.... Source: Debank: debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8 According to @EmberCN, this borrow-and-transfer pattern may be positioning for a short or hedge, which, if executed, could add near-term sell-side liquidity in ETH; traders can monitor Binance ETH net inflows and funding rate shifts for confirmation. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1980282037216133453

According to @OnchainLens, three newly created wallets withdrew a total of 63,539 ETH, worth about 253 million dollars, from Bitgo and Kraken, and the wallets may be linked to Bitmine. Source: @OnchainLens. The reported receiving addresses are 0x5c9244E0C43403D2F8bD6F9757c51F582Fb3004F, 0x4A9775F32f82a44Dd0eC529a9734f48Fd3B514D5, and 0x8Af012303a016EcA3C6ebEEF6Ec36bDB2E576D13. Source: @OnchainLens. Large exchange outflows like this are commonly interpreted as reducing immediate sell-side liquidity when coins move off exchanges to custody, a dynamic historically associated with accumulation rather than distribution. Source: Glassnode Academy.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xB041569B6FFac3B2cb6d289e85458E90B62D6ECB accumulated 2,971 ETH in the last 24 hours at an average price of $3,994, signaling sizable spot demand, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and the Arkham address page linked in the post. Of the total, 1,021 ETH were purchased on-chain for approximately $4.004 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. Two hours before the post, the wallet withdrew 1,950 ETH worth about $7.86 million from Bybit, indicating funds potentially moved for self-custody or on-chain deployment, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The wallet also has a resting CowSwap limit order of $1.93 million USDC to buy ETH at $3,860, adding visible bid-side liquidity at that level, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. Based on the figures cited, combined net accumulation exceeds $11.8 million over 24 hours, with key reference levels at the $3,994 average cost basis and the $3,860 bid price, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and the Arkham address page linked in the post.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Richard Heart-linked wallets that were dormant for two years redistributed ETH to 10 new addresses in the last hour, with address attribution and listings available via the Arkham Intelligence explorer. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the entity holds 154,825 ETH with an average acquisition cost of 3,779 USD per ETH, implying roughly 611 million USD in value and about 25.79 million USD in unrealized profit at current prices, while the intent of these transfers remains unspecified. According to Arkham Intelligence explorer and @ai_9684xtpa, the relevant wallet set has been compiled for monitoring so traders can track any subsequent exchange inflows from these addresses.

According to @lookonchain, wallets suspected to be tied to Richard Heart transferred 153,241 ETH (about $608M) to new wallets over the past 5 hours. According to @lookonchain, these wallets previously accumulated 162,937 ETH (about $619M) across 25 wallets between Mar 4–8, 2024 at an average purchase price of $3,800. According to @lookonchain, the 153,241 ETH moved equals roughly 94% of the 162,937 ETH previously accumulated. According to @lookonchain, related wallets also deposited 9,500 ETH (about $37.43M) into Tornado Cash over the past six months.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an unknown hacker wallet that received funds on March 28 has realized cumulative ETH trading losses exceeding $8.617 million since October based on on-chain tracing (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). The address panic-sold 8,637 ETH on 10/11, booking about $5.37 million in realized losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). On Oct 17, the same wallet sold 7,817 ETH at an average price of $3,733 with a reported average cost basis of $4,148.95, realizing approximately $3.247 million in additional losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Roughly one hour later, the wallet repurchased 2,815 ETH around $3,783, indicating rapid round-trip flows at these price levels (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can monitor the referenced Arkham Intelligence wallet addresses for further large ETH flows near the $3,700–$3,800 zone to inform short-term positioning and risk controls (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, on-chain entity 7 Siblings placed $14M in ETH limit buy orders between $3,401.01 and $3,801.01 during Oct 11–16, with $5M already filled, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The filled tranche totals 1,322.41 ETH at an average price of $3,780.95, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet to verify activity is explorer.cow.fi/address/0x28a55C4b4f9615FDE3CDAdDf6cc01FcF2E38A6b0, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The address reportedly holds about $450M worth of ETH on-chain, source: @ai_9684xtpa. Traders can track the reported $3.4K–$3.8K bid band and use $3,780.95 as a reference fill level for liquidity tracking and risk calibration, source: @ai_9684xtpa. Based on the reported figures, up to roughly $9M of orders could remain unfilled within that range as of the report; monitoring subsequent fills at the cited address can quantify ongoing demand, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to the source, a social media post dated 2025-10-16 claims BitMine bought 104,336 ETH (~$417M) during a 20% pullback from August highs, citing unspecified on-chain data (source: the source’s 2025-10-16 social post). The claim is unverified because no transaction hashes, wallet labels, or third-party analytics links were provided to substantiate the purchase (source: absence of on-chain references in the source post). Traders should wait for verifiable Etherscan transaction hashes and labeled wallet flows from reputable analytics such as Arkham or Nansen before positioning based on this headline (source: Ethereum’s public ledger and standard on-chain verification workflow). Until validated, treat this as an unconfirmed whale alert and avoid reactive entries predicated on the claim alone (source: lack of independently verifiable on-chain evidence at time of writing).

According to @EmberCN, the whale/institution that previously realized $93.74M in ETH swing-trading profits exited earlier this month at an average price of $4,458 and has resumed OTC accumulation by sending $39.87M USDC to Wintermute and withdrawing 10,000 ETH at $3,987 about 8 hours ago (source: @EmberCN; Arkham address intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x2aAF355c820676C104bd00Ee6c506FA05998dDa2). For trading, the $3,987 buy level and the prior $4,458 exit level are key whale-linked reference zones derived from these reported transactions (source: @EmberCN).

According to @EmberCN, an Ethereum whale was fully liquidated during the 10/11 flash crash, realizing a $2.04M loss; source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, the whale withdrew $9.5M USDC from Binance on 10/12 to re-enter ETH with a larger long position; source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, the address now holds a 18,900 ETH long with an average entry of $3,717 and an estimated position value of about $78M; source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, the position currently shows approximately $7.5M in unrealized profit following ETH’s rebound; source: @EmberCN on X. On-chain tracking for the wallet is provided at hyperbot.network/trader/0xb9fee4502de61504e5e6e69faa74df7f0ed6d365; source: HyperBot via @EmberCN.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, BMNR now holds over 3 million ETH, valued at more than $12 billion and equal to roughly 2.5% of the total ETH supply. Source: @MilkRoadDaily on X, Oct 14, 2025, https://twitter.com/MilkRoadDaily/status/1978203936332148807 This size implies an approximate reference price near $4,000 per ETH from the reported figures (12B divided by 3M), a useful anchor for assessing potential cost-basis risk if the position changes. Source: @MilkRoadDaily on X, Oct 14, 2025, https://twitter.com/MilkRoadDaily/status/1978203936332148807 For traders, monitor on-chain movements from the BMNR holder to exchanges, changes in its wallet balance, and staking deposit patterns, as such a concentrated position can materially affect ETH order-book liquidity and short-term volatility if moved. Source: @MilkRoadDaily on X, Oct 14, 2025, https://twitter.com/MilkRoadDaily/status/1978203936332148807

According to the source, BitMine Immersion now holds over 3.03M ETH after adding 202K ETH; however, the source post provides no wallet addresses, transaction hashes, or on-chain references, so the claim cannot be independently verified based on the provided content. For trading decisions, rely on verifiable data: confirm labeled addresses and balances on Etherscan and Arkham, track exchange netflows and large-transfer alerts on Nansen, and monitor staking deposit contract inflows via Glassnode before adjusting ETH exposure.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an unidentified hacker-linked entity that received capital on 2025-03-28 bought a total of 9,191.7 ETH on 2025-10-13 across four wallets at an average entry of 4,148.95 USD, totaling about 38.13 million USD, source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on 2025-10-13 and Arkham Intelligence explorer. The four wallets are listed on Arkham Intelligence at 0x9C92b8e71Ce902324FFe24e65AdFb82D7553bA52, 0xB5B10a1546101803C285eb39184cCE2c4e9Ab090, 0x8E9E92893505746FD704791d5CCAC3c89C66C6cD, and 0xa488E0Fa262a4423e83265612b3726C6fCC800F1, source: intel.arkm.com explorer pages. The author also reports this entity realized an estimated 2.04 million USD profit trading ETH in August, indicating an active trading history, source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on 2025-10-13. For trading reference, the 4,148.95 USD average defines the break-even level for these wallets and can be monitored alongside any transfers from the listed addresses for positioning changes, source: Arkham Intelligence explorer and the cited X post.

According to @EmberCN, a tracked whale who panic-sold ETH at $3,764 two days ago re-entered roughly 3 hours ago by buying back 7,817 ETH at $4,159. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1977525798786707886 According to @EmberCN and Arkham Intel, the wallet spent about 32.511M DAI for the repurchase, with flows visible on Arkham for addresses 0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae, 0x1c453fd449356e07661372859B7D6A6591987F72, and 0xA0168e235ac6F2b9FCA3d2f2e8461785B89faCb6. Sources: x.com/EmberCN/status/1977525798786707886; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x1c453fd449356e07661372859B7D6A6591987F72; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xA0168e235ac6F2b9FCA3d2f2e8461785B89faCb6 According to @EmberCN, the round-trip leaves the account with 820 fewer ETH than before, implying about $3.4M in position loss at the $4,159 repurchase price. Sources: x.com/EmberCN/status/1977525798786707886; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae

According to @OnchainLens, an ETH whale who reopened a 25x leveraged long has recovered with approximately USD 8 million in floating profit and shows USD 5.8 million in total gains, source: Onchain Lens on X dated Oct 12, 2025 and CoinMarketMan HyperTracker wallet 0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365. The position and PnL can be verified in real time on the referenced CoinMarketMan HyperTracker wallet page, source: CoinMarketMan HyperTracker and Onchain Lens on X.

According to @lookonchain, address 0xb9fe was fully liquidated during the market crash with a $2M loss. Source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 12, 2025. About five hours later, the wallet deployed 9.5M USDC to reopen a 25x long totaling 18,960 ETH with a reported notional of $72.7M. Source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 12, 2025. As of the latest update, the position shows approximately $2.24M unrealized profit, effectively recovering the prior loss. Source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 12, 2025. The wallet and position details are visible on the trader page for 0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365 on hyperdash.info. Source: Hyperdash trader profile.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365 deposited 9.5 million USDC to Hyperliquid within the past two hours and opened a 25x long of 18,960.93 ETH, notional about $70.76 million, with entry at $3,717.76 and liquidation at $3,282.87. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1977207849622081845; https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365 These figures imply roughly an 11.7% downside buffer from entry to liquidation, marking $3,282.87 as the critical margin risk threshold for this high-leverage ETH long. Source: same sources above

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale/institution accumulated 86,000 ETH between June and August at an average entry price of $3,023, based on Arkham Intelligence wallet data at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500, Source: X/@EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence. Since the early-morning drop yesterday, the address reduced exposure by 9,010 ETH, equal to roughly $34.05 million, Source: X/@EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500. From Sep 15, the entity began taking profit and has transferred a cumulative 24,020 ETH (about $103 million) to Binance at a realized average of $4,282, locking in $30.24 million in realized gains, Source: X/@EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500. The wallet still holds 61,981 ETH (about $232 million) as of the latest update, Source: X/@EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500. For trading reference specific to this address, the realized sell average is $4,282 and the cost basis is $3,023, which frame its historical supply behavior on exchanges, Source: X/@EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500.

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale bought 8,637 ETH at $4,402 using 38.017M DAI nine days ago and fully exited at $3,764 today for 32.511M DAI, locking in a $5.506M realized loss, source: @EmberCN on X and Arkham Intelligence. The transactions are attributed to addresses 0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae, 0x1c453fd449356e07661372859B7D6A6591987F72, and 0xA0168e235ac6F2b9FCA3d2f2e8461785B89faCb6, confirming a complete round-trip from DAI to ETH and back to DAI during today’s decline, source: Arkham Intelligence and @EmberCN on X.